Legal Opinion

Forrest v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 17, 2024No. 5:22-cv-03699Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANDREW FORREST, Case No. 22-cv-03699-PCP 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 10 META PLATFORMS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 104 Defendant. 11 12 13 Dr. Andrew Forrest brings this action against Meta Platforms, Inc. arising from Facebook 14 ads that allegedly show him endorsing fraudulent cryptocurrency and other investment products. 15 Dr. Forrest seeks damages and an injunction on several common law claims. For the reasons that 16 follow, Meta’s motion to dismiss is denied in part and granted in part. 17…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Kathleen Sonner v. Premier Nutrition Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Cmty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API