Senich v. American-Republican, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON THE PLAINTIFF EEOC’S MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT
SQUATRITO, District Judge.
The plaintiffs bring these actions pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), claiming, inter alia, that the defendant’s Special Severance Program discriminated on the basis of age.
Now pending before this Court is the plaintiff EEOC’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. For the reasons that follow, the plaintiffs motion is GRANTED.
I. LEGAL STANDARD
In the instant motion, plaintiff EEOC seeks to amend its complaint. Generally, a motion to amend is governed by Rule 15 of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey LittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Mark B. Pangburn v. James Culbertson, Court Clerk John M. York, Sheriff, & Sheriff's Property ClerkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. LA Weight LossDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- Lines v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Lusmat v. PapooshaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Meza v. Merritt River Partners LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Woolf v. SimoneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2020