George A. Kelly Co. v. Snyder
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 89, April T., 1914, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., March T., 1911, No. 3, on verdict for plaintiff in case of George A. Kelly Company v. G. A. Snyder, trading as Snyder’s Pharmacy, John W. Hyde, Garnishee.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 89, April T., 1914, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., March T., 1911, No. 3, on verdict for plaintiff in case of George A. Kelly Company v. G. A. Snyder, trading as Snyder’s Pharmacy, John W. Hyde, Garnishee. Issue to determine ownership of a stock of goods attached under the Act of March 17, 1869, P. L. 9. Before Carnahan, J. The .court charged in part as follows-: [There was a levy made upon the goods in this store, and Mr. Hyde was summoned as a garnishee. Mr. Hyde claims that the goods in the store did not belong to Snyder at the time of this levy or issuing…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, J .
Hyde Brothers owned and conducted an established drug store business, which, on February 10, 1910, by a written article of agreement for a consideration of $3,800, they hired and let to Gerald A. Snyder. The writing carefully enumerates the several promises of the parties. Snyder took possession of the drug store; placed his sign “G. A. Snyder, Drugs,” under the old sign “Hyde’s Drug Store” on the front of the store building, and the name “Snyder’s” across the prescription counter; $500 was paid in cash and the balance was secured by notes to become due monthly until the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilson v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Feingold v. SteinbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Schumacher-Binzley Co. v. RiddleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912