People v. DeCarlo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of his right to effective assistance of counsel is, in part, based on matter dehors the record and to that extent, it may not be reviewed on direct appeal (see People v Ramos, 77 AD3d 773 [2010]). Insofar *1260as the record permits review of the claim, we find that defense counsel provided meaningful representation (see People v Turner, 5 NY3d 476, 480 [2005]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]).
The defendant’s claim that his conviction of criminal sexual act in the third degree was not supported by legally sufficient evidence is not preserved…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.