Legal Opinion

In re Appeal of Borough of Zelienople

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1976No. Appeal, No. 720 C.D. 1975PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Kramer,

This case is before us for a second time following our remand to the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County. The facts involved are adequately set forth in our prior *636opinion1 and need not be repeated here. We remanded so that the lower court could make the findings of fact necessary to determine the legal residence of Robert C. Goetz and, in accordance with that determination, decide if Goetz is in compliance with the Borough of Zelienople’s employe residence requirement.

The lower court found that, during the period of time in question, Goetz’s legal residence was in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Philadelphia Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Goetz v. Borough of ZelienopleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. Board of Police CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Viggiano v. Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API