Legal Opinion

In Re the Arbitration Between Republique Francaise & Cellosilk Manufacturing Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1955Published

1Opinion of the Court

309 N.Y. 269 (1955)

In the Matter of the Arbitration between Republique Francaise, Respondent, and Cellosilk Manufacturing Company et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued April 13, 1955.

Decided July 8, 1955

John P. Gorman, Francis X. Nestor and Thomas P. Riordan for appellants appearing specially.

Edward W. Schall for respondent.

FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ., concur with CONWAY, Ch. J.; DESMOND, J., dissents in an opinion in which DYE and FULD, JJ., concur.

CONWAY, Ch. J.

In October, 1945, the respondent, Republique Francaise (hereinafter designated Republique),…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Forty-One Thirty-Six Wilcox Bldg. Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Grover & Baker Sewing MacHine Co. v. RadcliffeSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. In Re the Arbitration Between Gantt & Felipe Y Carlos Hurtado & Cia., Ltda.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. People v. One 1941 Chrysler SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API