Legal Opinion

Delisle v. Speedy Cash

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 20, 2020No. 3:18-cv-02042Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CINDY DELISLE and ROBERT Case No.: 3:18-cv-02042-GPC-RBB DOUGHERTY, individually and on 12 behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 13 COMPEL ARBITRATION AND Plaintiffs, STAY PROCEEDINGS UPON 14 v. REMAND 15 SPEEDY CASH, [ECF Nos. 18, 62, 63] 16 Defendant. 17 18 On July 24, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (“Ninth Circuit”) 19 vacated the Court’s Order Denying Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay 20 Proceedings (“Order”), ECF No. 23, and remanded for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API