Legal Opinion

In Re Norwalk Call

California Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1964No. L. A. No. 27516PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

62 Cal.2d 185 (1964)

In re Establishment of NORWALK CALL as a Newspaper of General Circulation. WHITEHEAD-DONOVAN CORPORATION, Petitioner and Respondent,

v.

HERALD PUBLISHING COMPANY, Contestant and Appellant.

L. A. No. 27516.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Dec. 24, 1964.

James G. Butler for Contestant and Appellant.

Robert F. Tyler for Petitioner and Respondent.

MOSK, J.

In accordance with statutory procedure, the petitioner sought a decree declaring it to be a newspaper of general circulation for the City of Norwalk, and the contesting newspaper filed an answer opposing such a decree. (See…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Lynch v. OverholserSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Werner v. Southern California Associated NewpapersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Geiger v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. United States Steel Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re Carson BulletinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. San Diego Commerce v. San Diego Daily TranscriptCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. In Re Tri-Valley HeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API