HSBC Bank USA v. Lugo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Tom, J.R, and DeGrasse, J.,
dissent in part in a memorandum by Tom, J.P., as follows: This Court is in agreement that defendant waived her right to seek dismissal of the complaint as abandoned pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c) and that she has not established the applicability of RPAPL 1304 so as to afford a basis for dismissal (RPAPL 1304 [5] [a] [iii]). However, I find that the motion court properly denied defendant’s motion to compel acceptance of the answer, given the absence of any excuse for the almost five-month delay in answering the complaint or the nearly two-year delay in making this motion…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- FID. & DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND v. Arthur Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Harcztark v. Drive Variety, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Addesso v. ShemtobNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Mufalli v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Smith v. Daca Taxi, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.