Legal Opinion

Newman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 15, 1904Published

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, entered in favor of the plaintiff upon a verdict directed by the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.

The real controversy in this case is not between plaintiff and defendant, but between the plaintiff and the .surviving children of the insured, for whose benefit the policy was taken out and whose battle the defendant is fighting. The defendant is not a mutual benefit association. Th'e defendant is a foreign corporation duly organized and existing as a life insurance company under the laws of the State of Massachusetts. By the two policies in question, it insured the life of Eva Fell in the amounts therein stated for the benefit of her children,' but the contract of insurance reserved to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Canavan v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1902
  2. Fink v. D. L. & W. Mutual Aid SocietyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API