Gorski v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Presiding Judge.
Keith Gorski appeals his conviction for sexually molesting his son. He alleges the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict because the guilty verdict is inconsistent with the jury acquitting him of two counts of aggravated child molestation, and that the trial court erred by denying his motion for a psychological examination of the victim. Held:
1. On appeal the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, Gorski no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence, the appellate court determines the sufficiency of the evidence and does not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Milam v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rose v. Figgie International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Patterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Moody v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- McLelland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.