Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Martin

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1897No. 2,201PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The appellee brought this action to recover the value of services rendered by him as a physician and surgeon for an employe of the appellant.

On the 10th of December, 1895, the cause, being at issue, was set for trial on the 17th day of the same month. On the 14th day of said month appellant moved for a change of venue from the county. The court overruled the motion, “for the reason,” stated *680in the ruling, as set forth in an entry copied in the transcript, “that this cause was heretofore set for trial in this court, in presence of local attorneys for both parties, and because of a published…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Evans v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Rout v. NindeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Bernhamer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Houser v. LaughlinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. State Ex Rel. Burdge v. CummingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Federal Cement Tile Co. v. KorffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. McClain v. SteeleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Peterson v. St. Clair Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API