Legal Opinion
Schulz v. Resor
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided September 17, 1971No. Civ. A. 69-C-353PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
REYNOLDS, District Judge.
This is an action pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1361, and 2241 for permanent injunctive relief.
Plaintiff is a member of the United States Army Reserves assigned, since May 25, 1966, to Company C, 961st Engineer Battalion, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. On October 30, 1968, active duty orders were issued ordering plaintiff to report for active duty on December 3, 1968. The active duty order was issued because of plaintiff’s allegedly unsatisfactory attendance (fifteen absences) at his reserve unit training meetings. Plaintiff alleges that his meeting…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thomas C. Smith, Appellant-Petitioner v. Stanley S. Resor, Secretary of the Army, Appellee-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Pvt. E2 Donald Jack Anderson, Ng26382581 v. Melvin LairdCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Byrne v. ResorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Gianatasio v. WhyteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Stephen C. Ansted v. Stanley R. Resor, Secretary of the Army, and Vernon P. Mock, Commandinggeneral, Fifth United States Army, Fort Sheridan, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Donahue v. O'ConnorDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1975
- Peters v. Secretary of ArmyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1978
- United States v. KilbrethUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1973