Legal Opinion

N. & E. Greenberg's Sons, Inc. v. Peter Pan Fur Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 20, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

While a defendant in a negligence action may implead its insurance broker who allegedly breached his agreement to provide full insurance coverage, it was error for the trial court to deny the third-party defendant’s motion to sever the main and third-party actions, as the third-party defendant would be subjected to some prejudice if both actions were tried together before the same jury (Thornton v. City of New York, 20 Misc 2d 838; Kelly v. Yannotti, 4 N Y 2d 603).

*454The order should he reversed, with $10 costs and the motion granted.

Concur — Hecht, J. P., Hoestadter and Gold, JJ.

Order reversed,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thornton v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harris v. ManosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Rauch v. BerlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  3. Crobak v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.New York Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API