Mele v. Tinelli
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and action restored to calendar for Supreme Court, Oneida County. Memorandum: Family Court has no jurisdiction to enforce a separation agreement as such (see Iseman v Iseman, 48 AD2d 809, app dsmd 37 NY2d 918; “Manheim” v “Manheim”, 200 Misc 802, 806; Besharov, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 29A, 1976-1982, Supp Pamph, Family Ct Act, § 411, p 71). Accordingly, Trial Term erred in transferring to Family Court plaintiff’s plenary action on the contract for the recovery of arrears under a separation agreement. (Appeal from order…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Iseman v. IsemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Manheim v. ManheimNew York Family Court · 1951
- Iseman v. IsemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tighe-Duck v. DuckNew York City Family Court · 1987