Legal Opinion

Mele v. Tinelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 1, 1983PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and action restored to calendar for Supreme Court, Oneida County. Memorandum: Family Court has no jurisdiction to enforce a separation agreement as such (see Iseman v Iseman, 48 AD2d 809, app dsmd 37 NY2d 918; “Manheim” v “Manheim”, 200 Misc 802, 806; Besharov, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 29A, 1976-1982, Supp Pamph, Family Ct Act, § 411, p 71). Accordingly, Trial Term erred in transferring to Family Court plaintiff’s plenary action on the contract for the recovery of arrears under a separation agreement. (Appeal from order…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Iseman v. IsemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Manheim v. ManheimNew York Family Court · 1951
  3. Iseman v. IsemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tighe-Duck v. DuckNew York City Family Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API