Legal Opinion
Sims v. Faestel
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 18, 1986No. Civ. A. 84-3726PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs in this action are three limited partners of Petren Oil and Gas Programs 1981A, 1981B, 1982A and 1982B. In August of 1984, they filed a complaint against David Faestel, Petren Resources Corpora tion (PRC), Faestel Investments, Inc. (FII) and the four Programs. After defendants filed a motion to dismiss, plaintiffs amended their complaint and moved for permission to drop the Programs as defendants and add claims against Arrowstone Corporation, Brian Hucker, Esquire and McDermott, Will & Emery. The amended complaint alleged that defendants sold plaintiffs…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Huddleston v. Herman & MacLeanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,922 James Bloor v. Carro, Spanbock, Londin, Rodman & FassCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- R. Richard Bastian, III v. Petren Resources CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Hayden v. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & GarrisonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Bastian v. Petren Resources Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- In Re the Loewen Group Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Sims (Robert), Deluca (Ralph W.), Rouse (John M.) v. Faestel (David), Petren Resources Corporation, McDermott Will & EmeryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.