Legal Opinion

Sampson v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1924No. 8 Div. 98PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

Motion was made in this case to retax certain costs incurred by the state in having summoned certain witnesses not examined. Courts cannot judicially know for what purposes witnesses are summoned, or that such witnesses were in excess of those allowed by statute. In a case of the character of the one on trial, the evidence sometimes takes a wide range, and the solicitor in preparing the ease for trial is permitted to anticipate defenses within legitimate bounds. In the absence of evidence convincing the court that ,the witnesses, whose costs were sought to be retaxed, were unnecessary or in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Kirby v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Moore v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hyche v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Mooneyham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Terrell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API