Donald Gregory Huls v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARTEAU, Senior Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Donald Gregory Huls appeals his two convictions of criminal recklessness, one as a Class C felony and one as a Class D felony. Ind.Code § 35-42-2-2 (2006). We affirm. 1
ISSUES
Huls raises three issues, which we restate as:
I. Whether Huls was entitled to a mistrial based on his claim of prosecuto-rial misconduct.
II. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by rejecting Huls’ proposed jury instructions on self-defense and mistake of fact.
III. Whether the State provided sufficient evidence to rebut Huls’ claim of self-defense.
FACTS AND…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wilson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Potter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Corbett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Boatright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Tharpe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Matthew Bryant v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Ryan E. Bean v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Larry Ervin v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Billy Russell v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Billy Campbell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.