Legal Opinion
Curtiss v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 6, 1932No. D-837PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBooth, Chief Justice
This is a patent case. The suit is for the recovery o,f just compensation alleged to be due the plaintiffs because of the infringement by the defendant of Letters Patent #1329038, granted January 27, 1920. The acts involved are the act of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 851), as amended by the act of July 1, 1918 (40 Stat. 705), and the act of October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. 394). We refer to the above acts in detail hereafter..
The defendant contests the right of the plaintiffs to sue, alleging that the facts disclose that on the date the suit was instituted the plaintiffs were no,t the owners of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fulmer v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1949
- City Bank and Trust Co. v. Otto Fabric, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1988
- City Bank & Trust Co. v. Otto Fabric, Inc. (In Re Otto Fabric, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1985
- Marlin Firearms Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936