Legal Opinion

Hardeman v. Mendon Leasing Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Joseph P. Sullivan at the Appellate Division (87 AD2d 232). We add that (1) subdivision 3 of section 388 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law expressly makes the liability of lessor and lessee joint and several, and (2) there was no due process violation because the lessor’s agent gave permission in fact and had the authority under Hendon’s contract with Midtown to refuse to do so.

Concur: Chief…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hardeman v. Mendon Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Palenkas v. Beaumont HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Walls v. ZuvicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Carter v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Koreman v. Chrysler Financial Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Marone v. ChavesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API