Legal Opinion

Vandermeer v. Belk

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1954No. 32936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

On September 7,1948, W. H. Jones and wife, being the owners of a certain tract of 1,022% acres of land on Hartstine Island, entered into a contract of sale thereof with Harry W. Smith and A. C. Belk as buyers. The contract contained the following “clause”:

“ . . . buyers are to be permitted to remove timber from above property, but buyers agree that purchasers of timber will pay the purchase price directly to sellers until full purchase is paid ...”

The contract contemplated the removal of timber by the purchasers without restrictions as to kind or amount, even though the sellers retained the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Browning v. BrowningWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Weiss v. WeissWashington Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API