Legal Opinion
Civil Service Forum v. New York City Transit Authority
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohn E. Cone, J.
Defendants New York City Transit Authority and the Transport Workers Union of America, CIO, challenge the legal sufficiency of the complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice. The action is one brought by plaintiffs for a judgment declaring, among other things, that the collective bargaining agreement entered into by the defendants as of July 1, 1954 and its extension in September, 1955 are illegal and void. After the complaint was served the Transport Workers Union applied to the court for leave to *348intervene as a party defendant and the application was granted upon consent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rockland Light and Power Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Admiral Realty Co. v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Red Robin Stores, Inc. v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Pletman v. GoldsollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
3Cited by3 opinions
- Erie County Water Authority v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Civil Service Forum v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- De Milia v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 1978