United States v. Marasilis

STARR, Chief Judge.

This matter came on to be heard upon the government’s motion for a summary judgment based on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that the government is entitled to a judgment for the relief prayed for as a matter of law. It appears that the defendant and her counsel were given proper notice of the hearing on the government’s motion, and the' United States attorney stated on the record that defendant’s counsel had informed him that' neither he nor the defendant Would be present.

On March 24, 1953, the government filed a complaint and on May…