Warwick v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County
1Opinion of the Court
Shelley, J.,
This matter is before us on a preliminary objection in the form of a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint in assumpsit.
Plaintiff, as the beneficiary, brought an action on a policy of insurance, wherein the husband of plaintiff was the insured. A copy of the basic policy,1 with three *516rider forms, is attached to the complaint as an exhibit. The rider forms are identified as rider form 1606M,2 rider form 1959M,3 and rider form 2162M.4 Rider *517form 1959M was superseded by rider form 2162M.
There appears on the first page of the basic policy in large overwritten characters the words “THIS IS…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weissman v. PRASHKERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Hindman v. FarrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Smith v. CassidaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Edwin J. Schoettle Co. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Quarture Et Ux. v. Allegheny Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.