Legal Opinion

Warwick v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided December 6, 1965No. 1209Published

1Opinion of the Court

Shelley, J.,

This matter is before us on a preliminary objection in the form of a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint in assumpsit.

Plaintiff, as the beneficiary, brought an action on a policy of insurance, wherein the husband of plaintiff was the insured. A copy of the basic policy,1 with three *516rider forms, is attached to the complaint as an exhibit. The rider forms are identified as rider form 1606M,2 rider form 1959M,3 and rider form 2162M.4 Rider *517form 1959M was superseded by rider form 2162M.

There appears on the first page of the basic policy in large overwritten characters the words “THIS IS…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weissman v. PRASHKERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Hindman v. FarrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Smith v. CassidaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Edwin J. Schoettle Co. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Quarture Et Ux. v. Allegheny Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API