Legal Opinion

Belmonte v. Capodilupo

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 30, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

This is an action of tort for death in which the plaintiff had a verdict which was recorded under leave reserved. Thereafter, subject to the plaintiff’s exception, the judge entered a verdict for the defendant. The case comes here by report and the only question for decision is whether there was a case for the jury. See Berwick & Smith Co. v. Salem Press, Inc. 331 Mass. 196.

The evidence was as follows: The defendant was the owner of property at 91 Prince Street, Boston, which consisted of two five story multiple dwelling units. The units, originally separate, had been joined by a ground floor…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Comeau v. ComeauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. LeBlanc v. Atlantic Building & Supply Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. O'Brien v. Harvard Restaurant & Liquor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Greenfield v. FreedmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  5. Coates v. First National Stores Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paris v. Howard D. Johnson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  2. Francis R. Burns v. Turner Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
  3. Gopoian v. Squire Road Cabin, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1963
  4. Rugnetta v. Alden's, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API