Musselman v. Wise
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Carroll Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.
The appellant moved for judgment upon his complaint, notwithstanding the verdict for the defendant, and' now insists that the motion ought to have been sustained.
The complaint is in two paragraphs, the answer in four paragraphs, and the reply a general denial. The appellant had demurred to each paragraph of the answer, but withdrew the demurrer before it had been ruled on.
*249The first paragraph of the complaint charges that on the day of its date the defendant made with the plaintiff the following contract in writing, to wit:
“Camden, May 9th, 1878.
“ I have this day bargained with Aaron Musselman…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mayes v. GoldsmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Keller v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by5 opinions
- McDuffie v. Lynchburg Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Campbell v. WrayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Harrison v. MasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Goldweber v. CallahanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
- Jaqua v. ShewalterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893