Legal Opinion
Hochman v. Bollt
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided May 5, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District. Action by Hersh Hochman against Jennie Bollt. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
The plaintiff leased from the defendant for a term of three years a tenement house. The annual rental was the sum of $4,522, payable in equal monthly installments of $376.83. The lease provided that:
“The party of the second part has this day deposited with the party of the first part the sum of seven hundred and fifty-three and 32/ioo ($753.32) dollars as security for the ^faithful performances of all terms, covenants, and conditions in the within 'lease contained; it being expressly understood and agreed that, if the party of the second part surrender said premises or is dispossessed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Feinsot v. BursteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Feyer v. ReissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Feinsot v. . BursteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Feinsot v. BursteinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ambler Garage, Inc. v. PeopleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Haber v. SchonzeitAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
- Kreiger v. NusbaumAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917
- Stimpson v. Minsker Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1915