Legal Opinion

Carrancho v. California Air Resources Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 13, 2003No. C040237PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAYE, Acting R J.

In 1991 the Legislature enacted a statutory scheme to phase down the practice of burning rice straw left over after harvest and to develop alternative uses for the straw. These alternatives failed to materialize as hoped, and growers had to incorporate almost all of the straw back into the soil, a practice that was costly and contributed to the incidence of rice disease. In 1997 the Legislature amended the statute to suspend until 2000 the gradual reduction in the amount of straw burned. As part of the amendment, state agencies responsible for managing the phasedown…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Industrial Welfare Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Fullerton Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Lewin v. St. Joseph Hospital of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. California Oak Foundation v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Alejo v. TorlaksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Plastic Pipe & Fitting Ass'n v. California Building Standards CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Colyear v. Rolling Hills Community Ass'n of Rancho Palos VerdesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API