Legal Opinion

Huntzinger v. Devlin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 1922No. Appeal, No. 20PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

This suit was in assumpsit to recover for printing paper-books ordered by defendant’s attorney. Defendant was nonsuited. A rule to take off the nonsuit! was discharged and this appeal followed. In our practice a nonsuit is in the nature of a judgment for defendant on demurrer to the evidence, the defendant being considered as admitting every fact which the evidence tends to prove. Prom the evidence in this record the jury would have been warranted in finding the following facts: In 1917 Lorenzo Anastasia brought suit against this defendant in the Court of Common Pleas…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gray v. HowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Kissick v. HunterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  3. Reinholdt v. AlbertiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1808

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Messenger Publishing Co. v. WalkinshawSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Netter v. LoganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. McCarthy v. Recordex Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API