Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 12, 1998No. 98-1277PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Because the uneontroverted evidence showed that the defendant did not have the ability to pay the court-ordered restitution, the trial court erred by finding that the *118defendant had willfully violated his probation. Therefore, we reverse the order extending his probation. See Hewett v. State, 613 So.2d 1305 (Fla.1993); White v. State, 693 So.2d 119 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Laing v. State, 622 So.2d 560 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Reversed.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hewett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Laing v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. White v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Huard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007