Legal Opinion

People v. Horton

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1981No. Docket 55116PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Remand

Before: Danhof, C.J., and Cynar and Mackenzie, JJ. Danhof, C.J.

Defendant was tried before a jury on charges of felony murder (rape), MCL 750.316; MSA 28.548, and first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b; MSA 28.788(2). He was convicted of felony murder but acquitted of criminal sexual conduct. In People v Horton, 99 Mich App 40; 297 NW2d 857 (1980), we reversed under the inconsistent verdict doctrine, holding that the felony-murder conviction based on a completed act of criminal sexual conduct could not stand where defendant was found not guilty of the same criminal sexual…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. People v. VaughnMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. HortonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. VaughnMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SeilerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  2. Bates & Beharry v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. People v. JancarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. People v. WhetstoneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API