Legal Opinion

State v. Will

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 28, 1896PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Wright District Court. — Hon. B. P. Birdsall, Judge. The defendant was indicted for and convicted of a liquor nuisance, was sentenced to pay a fine and appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Kinne, J

1 *612 *59I. The indictment charges the defendant with the crime of nuisance, and is in the usual form. Defendant moved to set it aside for the following reasons: Because it was found upon the compulsory order and direction of the judge of the district court, that after the grand jury had reported that they had no further business, and asked to be discharged, the court ordered them to return to their jury room; and that the judge of said court afterwards went to said jury room, without being requested so to do by the grand jury, and directed said grand jury to find said indictment; and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. TurlingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  4. State v. GibbsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  5. State v. KimballSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. People Ex Rel. Sears v. RomitiIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. RockerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. State v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. State v. ErnsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API