State v. Winborne
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Littlejohn, Justice:
Bernard Winborne was tried by a jury and convicted of possession of less than an ounce of marijuana, first offense', under §§ 44-53-190(d) 10, 44-53-110 and 44-53-370(c), (d) 2-3, Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976). At trial his attorney moved to suppress the State’s evidence, because the search warrant used to obtain the evidence was based on an affidavit that did not state the time at which the informant observed the evidence on the premises.
At the close of the State’s case, counsel moved for a directed verdict on the grounds that there was no- competent evidence to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fong Foo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
- Bentley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- State v. BeckhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. AdkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. 192 Coin-Operated Video Game MacHinesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Commonwealth v. SmalisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.