Legal Opinion

Montana Wholesale Accounts Service v. Penington

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1988No. 88-157PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court, Thirteenth Judicial District, Yellowstone County, denying appellant’s motion for change of venue. We affirm.

Appellant Penington presents two issues on appeal.

1. Did the District Court abuse its discretion in denying Penington’s December 23, 1987 motion for change of venue?

2. Is Penington entitled to attorney fees associated with this appeal?

The appellant contracted with Epcon Sign Company (Epcon) to purchase and install certain signs as part of the renovation of a building called Penington Place located in Great Falls. Epcon’s main office…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. FIRST FEDERAL SAV. & L. ASS'N OF GREAT FALLSMontana Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Electrical Products Consolidated v. BodellMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Letford v. KrausMontana Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mechanics Laundry & Supply, Inc. v. Wilder Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. In Re the Marriage of LockmanMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Fjelstad v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Mechanics Laundry & Supply, Inc. v. Wilder Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Moran v. JacksonMontana Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API