Montana Wholesale Accounts Service v. Penington
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court, Thirteenth Judicial District, Yellowstone County, denying appellant’s motion for change of venue. We affirm.
Appellant Penington presents two issues on appeal.
1. Did the District Court abuse its discretion in denying Penington’s December 23, 1987 motion for change of venue?
2. Is Penington entitled to attorney fees associated with this appeal?
The appellant contracted with Epcon Sign Company (Epcon) to purchase and install certain signs as part of the renovation of a building called Penington Place located in Great Falls. Epcon’s main office…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brown v. FIRST FEDERAL SAV. & L. ASS'N OF GREAT FALLSMontana Supreme Court · 1964
- Electrical Products Consolidated v. BodellMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- Letford v. KrausMontana Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mechanics Laundry & Supply, Inc. v. Wilder Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re the Marriage of LockmanMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- Fjelstad v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Mechanics Laundry & Supply, Inc. v. Wilder Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Moran v. JacksonMontana Supreme Court · 1995