Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Kroger Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 30, 1999No. A98A2357PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

This appeal arises out of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Kroger Company in this slip-and-fall action. Because we conclude that genuine issues of material fact exist for jury resolution, we reverse.

Construed in favor of the non-movant on motion for summary judgment, evidence was presented to the trial court that Tina Stephens, along with her husband, son, and mother, entered a Kroger grocery store on a rainy February day. They walked through an enclosed vestibule containing at least two mats and then through the main entranceway into the store. Stephens testified…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  3. Sharfuddin v. Drug Emporium, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Barksdale v. NuwarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Johnston v. Grand Union Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Val D'Aosta Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Pylant v. Samuels, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Hudson v. JH HARVEY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Broadnax v. SSF Imported Auto Parts LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2023
  5. Pylant v. Samuels, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API