Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Fortesa-Ruiz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 27, 1990No. 88-2871Published

1DissentGersten, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I find two grounds upon which I would reverse and remand: (1) the suppression of the evidence amounted to a dismissal and is unduly harsh; and (2) the motion to suppress fails to comply with rule 3.190(h), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, because: (a) it does not clearly state the particular evidence sought to be suppressed; and (b) it fails to state sufficient facts which, if true, would demonstrate that the evidence is inadmissible. Both of these grounds would independently support a reversal.

I

SUPPRESSION AMOUNTED TO AN IMPROPER DISMISSAL AND WAS UNDULY HARSH.

On…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. Del GaudioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Morales v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. State v. S.M.F.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. State v. EvansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. State v. LoweDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API