State v. Fortesa-Ruiz
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentGersten, Judge
I respectfully dissent. I find two grounds upon which I would reverse and remand: (1) the suppression of the evidence amounted to a dismissal and is unduly harsh; and (2) the motion to suppress fails to comply with rule 3.190(h), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, because: (a) it does not clearly state the particular evidence sought to be suppressed; and (b) it fails to state sufficient facts which, if true, would demonstrate that the evidence is inadmissible. Both of these grounds would independently support a reversal.
I
SUPPRESSION AMOUNTED TO AN IMPROPER DISMISSAL AND WAS UNDULY HARSH.
On…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. Del GaudioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Morales v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- State v. S.M.F.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- State v. EvansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- State v. LoweDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.