Floyd v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
STUART, Justice.1
This Court issued a writ of certiorari to determine whether the following holdings of the Court of Criminal Appeals in Christopher Anthony Floyd’s appeal from his capital-murder conviction are proper: that the Houston Circuit Court (“the trial court”) did not err in holding that the State provide4 valid race- and gender-neutral reasons for its exercise of its peremptory strikes during jury selection, that the trial court did not err by refusing to admit into evidence all of Floyd’s statements made to .law-enforcement officers, and that the trial court did not err in denying…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RobertsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Ex parte FloydSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016