Legal Opinion

In Re Fader Motor Company

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided July 19, 1968PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Chancellor:

This is the decision on the merits of a claim filed by the Estate of A. Franklin Fader (“Estate”) against the Receiver of Fader Motor Co., a Delaware corporation (“Receiver”). The Estate, as subrogee of Universal C.I.T. Credit Corporation (“C.I. T.”), seeks, inter alia, an adjudication that it had a lien on certain funds owed to Fader Motor Co. (“Fader Co.”) by the Ford Motor Company (“Ford”), and that the lien arose prior-to appointment of the Receiver. The Receiver has objected to the claim.

The Estate claims a lien based upon an agreement between C.I.T. and Fader Co.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Michigan Chandelier Co. v. MorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Burke v. HoffmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  3. Hoffmann v. TownsendSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Central National Bank v. Bateman & Companies, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1925
  5. Interstate Finance Corp. v. Dodson, Rec.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ash v. Brunswick CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
  2. In Re MendenhallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1980
  3. Bank of Boston v. HauflerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  4. Matter of Castle Mall, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API