Legal Opinion

State v. Hibl

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2006No. 2004AP2936-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

2006 WI 52

State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner,

v.

Brian Hibl, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 2004AP2936-CR.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Opinion Filed: May 26, 2006.

For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner, the cause was argued by Christopher G. Wren, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was Peggy A. Lautenschlager, attorney general.

For the defendant-respondent there was a brief by Joel H. Rosenthal and Luck & Rosenthal, S.C., Milwaukee, and oral argument by Joel H. Rosenthal.

An amicus curiae brief was filed by Keith A. Findley, John A. Pray, Byron C. Lichstein and University…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API