Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cameron Fagen v. Grand View University, Npi Security, and Ross Iddings

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 3, 2015No. 14–0095Published

1DissentMansfield, Justice

I respectfully dissent. A good deal of the plurality’s reasoning makes sense to me. However, I am concerned we are disregarding the question we are supposed to answer, and instead, answering a question nobody asked us to answer.

*837I. The Garden-Variety Exception.

This appeal is not about specific mental health records. The question Fagen has raised on appeal is whether a defendant can obtain any of the plaintiffs mental health records when the plaintiff seeks only garden-variety emotional distress damages. I would reject Fagen’s appeal for three reasons.

First, Fagen is alleging “mental…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Jonas Dorian NeiderbachSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. Pexa v. Auto Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  3. Estate of Pearson v. Interstate Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. Miller v. RohlingSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  5. Sabree v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local No. 33District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API