Legal Opinion

Gatesco Q.M., LTD. v. City of Houston

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided October 28, 2010No. 14-09-00176-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.

The primary issue in this appeal is the proper construction of section 13.042 of the Texas Water Code, a provision that has been construed in conflicting ways by various Texas courts of appeals. In the case under review a consumer, the owner of an apartment complex, sought declaratory and injunctive relief against a municipality that provided water service to the complex. The trial court dismissed the consumer’s claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Our dual charge on appeal is to determine whether section 13.042 deprived the trial court of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. County of Cameron v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Texas Department of Transportation v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. The City of El Paso v. Lilli M. HeinrichTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of League City, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  2. Montrose Management District v. 1620 Hawthorne, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  3. Lone Star College System and Richard Carpenter v. Immigration Reform Coalition of Texas (IRCOT), Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  4. the Board of Trustees of the Galveston Wharves v. E. L. O'Rourke, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  5. Gatesco Q.M. Ltd. v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API