Legal Opinion

Capman v. Colvin

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 1, 2015No. 14-3497PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Eric Capman, at age 42, applied for disability benefits and supplemental security income after mental and physical impairments left him unable to work. An administrative law judge (“ALJ”) denied benefits, finding that Capman retained the residual functional capacity (“RFC”) to perform work at all exertional levels but with certain limitations. Capman challenges this RFC determination and particularly the ALJ’s omission of other limitations that he claims are necessary. The district court rejected this argument and we affirm.

I. Background

In 1987 Capman enlisted in .the Navy, where he was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Villano v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Jennifer Moore v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Linda Roddy v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. O'Connor-Spinner v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Rebecca Pepper v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Passig v. ColvinDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Tracie H. v. SaulDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. Pingel v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2016
  4. Wolf v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2016
  5. Aimee Apke v. Andrew SaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API