Legal Opinion

Rodine v. Drew

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 22, 1935No. 30,368PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I. M. Olsen, Justice.

Certiorari to review the decision of the trial court denying the petition of Marion E. I. Rodine and Elmer Rodine for relief under L. 1933, c. 339, part 1, § 4, 3 Mason Minn St. 1934 Supp. § 9633-5, being the law permitting the district courts to extend the time for redemption from foreclosure sales under the conditions in said .section stated.

Petitioners owned an old two-story frame dwelling house and the two lots on which it is located, at the intersection of Portland avenue and East Lake street in Minneapolis. The respondent, Charles M. Drew, held a second mortgage for…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Youngs v. BurlesonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Augustana Pension & Aid Fund v. NagleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  3. National Bank of Aitkin v. ShowellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Falk v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API