Legal Opinion

Gibbs v. Kinsey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 1, 1991PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Due process requires that one be given notice and an opportunity to be heard before one’s interest in property may be adversely affected by judicial process. Here, the relief sought by Kinsey would violate that rule insofar as he seeks to enforce the writ of assistance against Bey, who was not joined as a party to the proceeding (see, County Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn, v First Pa. Realty Corp., 29 AD2d 675, affd 23 NY2d 680). Even if Bey has no legitimate interest in the property, Kinsey cannot evict her without commencing an eviction action or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. First Pennsylvania Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nationwide Associates, Inc. v. BrunneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Citibank, N.A. v. PlagakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. SI Bank & Trust v. SheriffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Green Point Savings Bank v. DefourNew York Supreme Court · 1994
  5. United States v. Real Property & Premises Known as 63-39 Trimble RoadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API