Legal Opinion

Petersen v. New York Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 21, 1938No. 44335PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

— Appellee filed a motion to dismiss this appeal because of total failure to observe Rule 30, which motion was submitted with the ease. That there must be some attempt, at least, to comply with Rule 30 of this court in presenting an appeal in a law ease has been pointed out so often that no citation of authorities is necessary. In this ease, no attempt whatever was made to comply. Appellant makes no claim that Ride 30 was followed. Appellant’s only answer to the motion to dismiss is that this case was tried in equity by stipulation of the parties.

Here is what the record shows: Jury was waived…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baker v. JamisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  2. Steltzer v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  3. Clearfield Bank v. OlinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. Hostler Coal & Lumber Co. v. StuffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ColemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Independent School District v. HartwickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  3. Younkin v. Rubio Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API