Legal Opinion

Woodman v. Walter

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1994No. Docket No. 145880PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an October 3, 1991, order granting summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(0(10) in favor of defendants in this action to enforce a construction lien. We affirm.

The only issue to be determined on appeal is whether the ninety-day period for filing of lien claims provided in the Construction Lien Act, MCL 570.1101 et seq.; MSA 26.316(101) et seq., may be extended by the performance of warranty work. We find that it may not.

The act provides in part:

Notwithstanding section 109 the right of a contractor, subcontractor, laborer, or supplier to a construction lien created by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Central Coast Electric, Inc. v. MendellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. P. H. Broughton & Sons, Inc. v. Muller & Allen Realty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stock Building Supply, LLC v. Parsley Homes of Mazuchet Harbor, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Massey Asphalt Paving, Inc. v. Lee Land Development, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API