Legal Opinion

Phoenix Land & Improvement Co. v. Seidel

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1909Published

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. Hermann Brumbach, Judge. (1) The court did not err in giving plaintiff’s peremptory instruction at the close of all the evidence. Bank v. Hainiine, 67 Mo. App. 488; Zwisler v. Storts, 30 Mb. App. 174; Asphalt Co. v. Transit Co., 102 Mo. App. 476; Woolf v. Campbell, 110 Mo.-114. (2) The evidence utterly failed to show an eviction. Lincoln Trust Co. v. Lincoln, 175 Mo. 43; Gray v. Gaff, 8 Mo. App. 392; French v. Pettingill, 128 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. Hermann Brumbach, Judge. (1) The court did not err in giving plaintiff’s peremptory instruction at the close of all the evidence. Bank v. Hainiine, 67 Mo. App. 488; Zwisler v. Storts, 30 Mb. App. 174; Asphalt Co. v. Transit Co., 102 Mo. App. 476; Woolf v. Campbell, 110 Mo.-114. (2) The evidence utterly failed to show an eviction. Lincoln Trust Co. v. Lincoln, 175 Mo. 43; Gray v. Gaff, 8 Mo. App. 392; French v. Pettingill, 128 Mo. App. 156;' Delmar Investment Co. v. Blumenfield, 118 Mo. App. 108; O’Neill v. Manget, 44 Mo. App. 279; Jackson v. Eddy, 12…

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.

This is aimiaffitwanfi hyuaoáaastlDÉfl against a tenant for rent. The trial court peremptorily cliré'Ct'ed’' á-5 véi’dféF'fttiP íhé’^lafh’tííf,’ ^lunl db?éMléiít appealed .álfí)i)ÍIO<JEi

-•rag $<h M'^4n9i#^rIof Plfintiff ^Mcfc?7Fasíi.pW¡:oft,afs;p3imb/^, 94 gftjfqfhfttuP .,hiii®g as ,*j?-55 •ftííiflPl* „sjptingto|0^y^ii.rpo^s,0iyag^l3the:|lp>ve^fl9y iflppr, (^e^e^a^^yej^jbsgSn^^c^Yya^j-i^ytei.lntQx, a$j| p-xfend^ jup^ef ^g,i%tij;§Hb,]ii% „Wg- p ^pfppd,aiv4r!Wtii;.%hi§]/iwj% ^.^^jiildye^qenigr^ ■•i®tp Rf^essipp' ft>nd gn$jgpfeg<£h& flgíxiíW ^,eji ig: c|gi|n^slá^((BÍftintp^íf<^^j4^^d^1 ^…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. French v. PettingillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API