Legal Opinion

Maddox v. City of Middlesboro

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 29, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Turner, Commissioner—

Affirming.

Appellant M'addox, claiming to be tbe prosecuting attorney of tbe city of Middlesboro, brought this action against that city and its officials for a mandamus requiring them to pay him compensation as such prosecuting attorney.

W. Gr. Colson intervened in the action, claiming also to be such prosecuting attorney, and sought similar relief against the city and its officials.

The city of Middlesboro is a city of the third class, and after the legislative act of 1914 authorizing such action, it by an election accepted the provisions of that act…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whitney v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  2. Calhoun v. JettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dupin v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  2. Hales v. LangfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API