Legal Opinion
Southern Home Insurance v. Faulkner
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 15, 1909PublishedCited by 10 opinions
This case was decided by Division B. Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Taylor County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The defendants in error as plaintiffs beIpw sued the plaintiff in error as defendant below in the Circuit Court for Taylor County upon a fire insurance policy, which policy was attached to and made a part of the declaration by apt words.
The defendant company filed two- pleas, the first of which was as follows :
“The defendant by its attorney for plea to the declaration styled Action on contract, Damages $1000.’ says that prior to the institution of said action and after said fire there was a disagreement as to the amount of the loss, the same being a partial loss, the plaintiff was duly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hamilton v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Carroll v. Girard Fire Insurance of the City of PhiladelphiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Hanover Fire Insurance v. B. C. Lewis & SonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
- Old Saucelito Land & Dry Dock Co. v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Southern Home Insurance v. PutnalSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- Duval County v. Charleston Engineering & Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Mike Bradford & Co. v. Gulf States Steel Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. J. H. Blackshear, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
- Transamerica Ins. Co. v. WeedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.