Legal Opinion

Okmulgee Supply Corp. v. Anthis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 15, 1940No. 28680PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

Plaintiffs, Ernest R. Anthis and other owners of land in Creek county, and Sam McPherson, assignee of the lessee in an oil and gas lease covering such land, brought this action to restrain defendants Okmulgee Supply Corporation, Roberts, Colchensky, and Ford from removing equipment used in producing oil and gas from wells on the land involved. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

It is undisputed that at the time the action was brought there were three producing oil wells on the property, one small gas well which furnished fuel for the operation of the oil wells, and one well…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gypsy Oil Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Indiana Oil, Gas & Development Co. v. McCrorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Parks v. Sinai Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Shellar v. ShiversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Collins v. Mount Pleasant Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Willison v. Consolidation Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. HALL v. GALMORSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  3. Gallaspy v. WarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Henry v. ClaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Pieszchalski v. OslagerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API